ReviewSSM - health systems2025
Financing and purchasing mechanisms of primary health care in Southeast Asia region: Findings from a scoping review.
Review in SSM - health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Asia at the Epicenter of the Global Cardiometabolic Shift.JACC. Asia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Despite commitment to Primary Health Care (PHC), financing has been a persistent challenge in Southeast Asia, with limited discussions. To address this knowledge gap, this study explores three key financing mechanisms: revenue mobilization, pooling, and purchasing across the region. Methods: A scoping review, with searches in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar, was conducted. Screening was done via Covidence, with data extracted and analyzed in Excel using a framework analysis. Results: Of 2521 sources, 171 were included. Limited information specific to PHC was found. Revenue mobilization mainly includes out-of-pocket payment, government funding, social insurance contributions, and a mix of government and external funding. Pooling for PHC financing was seen in Thailand, while other countries showed multiple levels of pooling under general health financing. The prevalent purchasing method for public facilities is line-item budgeting, with salaries as the primary payment method for healthcare providers. Some countries employ performance-linked methods and capitation for provider payments. Significant challenges include inadequate budget allocations, financial flow fragmentation, and poor coordination and low capacity for financial management. Conclusion: Financing for PHC is found to be insufficient and inefficient, mainly using traditional mechanisms. Cross-country learning and collaboration can support the development of strategic PHC financing mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.