ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Artificial intelligence in acute appendicitis: A comprehensive review of machine learning and deep learning applications.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Progress on Bioinspired Superhydrophobic Photothermal Anti-/Deicing Coatings.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Usefulness of Laboratory-Based Machine Learning for Detection and Severity Classification of Acute Appendicitis in a Resource-Limited Healthcare Setting.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-assisted vs. textbook-based vs. blended learning for acute abdomen diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study of emergency interns.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute appendicitis (AAp) remains one of the most common abdominal emergencies, requiring rapid and accurate diagnosis to prevent complications and unnecessary surgeries. Conventional diagnostic methods, including medical history, clinical assessment, biochemical markers, and imaging techniques, often present limitations in sensitivity and specificity, especially in atypical cases. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated remarkable potential in enhancing diagnostic accuracy through machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models. This review evaluates the current applications of AI in both adult and pediatric AAp, focusing on clinical data-based models, radiological imaging analysis, and AI-assisted clinical decision support systems. ML models such as random forest, support vector machines, logistic regression, and extreme gradient boosting have exhibited superior diagnostic performance compared to traditional scoring systems, achieving sensitivity and specificity rates exceeding 90% in multiple studies. Additionally, DL techniques, particularly convolutional neural networks, have been shown to outperform radiologists in interpreting ultrasound and computed tomography images, enhancing diagnostic confidence. This review synthesized findings from 65 studies, demonstrating that AI models integrating multimodal data including clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters further improved diagnostic precision. Moreover, explainable AI approaches, such as SHapley Additive exPlanations and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, have facilitated model transparency, fostering clinician trust in AI-driven decision-making. This review highlights the advancements in AI for AAp diagnosis, emphasizing that AI is used not only to establish the diagnosis of AAp but also to differentiate complicated from uncomplicated cases. While preliminary results are promising, further prospective, multicenter studies are required for large-scale clinical implementation, given that a great proportion of current evidence derives from retrospective designs, and existing prospective cohorts exhibit limited sample sizes or protocol variability. Future research should also focus on integrating AI-driven decision support tools into routine emergency care workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.