Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358178›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2025

Artificial intelligence in acute appendicitis: A comprehensive review of machine learning and deep learning applications.

Sami Akbulut, Zeynep Kucukakcali, Cemil Colak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sami AkbulutSurgery and Liver Transplantation, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Türkiye.
Zeynep KucukakcaliBiostatistics and Medical Informatics, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Türkiye.
Cemil ColakBiostatistics and Medical Informatics, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute appendicitis (AAp) remains one of the most common abdominal emergencies, requiring rapid and accurate diagnosis to prevent complications and unnecessary surgeries. Conventional diagnostic methods, including medical history, clinical assessment, biochemical markers, and imaging techniques, often present limitations in sensitivity and specificity, especially in atypical cases. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated remarkable potential in enhancing diagnostic accuracy through machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models. This review evaluates the current applications of AI in both adult and pediatric AAp, focusing on clinical data-based models, radiological imaging analysis, and AI-assisted clinical decision support systems. ML models such as random forest, support vector machines, logistic regression, and extreme gradient boosting have exhibited superior diagnostic performance compared to traditional scoring systems, achieving sensitivity and specificity rates exceeding 90% in multiple studies. Additionally, DL techniques, particularly convolutional neural networks, have been shown to outperform radiologists in interpreting ultrasound and computed tomography images, enhancing diagnostic confidence. This review synthesized findings from 65 studies, demonstrating that AI models integrating multimodal data including clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters further improved diagnostic precision. Moreover, explainable AI approaches, such as SHapley Additive exPlanations and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, have facilitated model transparency, fostering clinician trust in AI-driven decision-making. This review highlights the advancements in AI for AAp diagnosis, emphasizing that AI is used not only to establish the diagnosis of AAp but also to differentiate complicated from uncomplicated cases. While preliminary results are promising, further prospective, multicenter studies are required for large-scale clinical implementation, given that a great proportion of current evidence derives from retrospective designs, and existing prospective cohorts exhibit limited sample sizes or protocol variability. Future research should also focus on integrating AI-driven decision support tools into routine emergency care workflows.

Indexed as

AppendicitisDeep LearningMachine LearningAcute DiseaseArtificial IntelligenceDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyAcute appendicitisArtificial intelligenceComplicated appendicitisDecision support systemsDeep learningDiagnosisExplainable artificial intelligenceMachine learningPredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID41358178
PMCPMC12678916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.