ArticleiScience2025
Roles for somatostatin and parvalbumin interneurons in learning and arousal during trace conditioning.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dopamine dynamics as a regulatory mechanism for shifting between defensive and reward-seeking behaviors.Communications biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural circuits must integrate sensory cues and their outcomes to guide learning, yet how distinct inhibitory interneurons contribute to this process remains a central question. This study investigates the specific roles of somatostatin (SST) and parvalbumin (PV) interneurons in the primary somatosensory cortex during trace eyeblink conditioning. We found that SST interneuron activity dynamically tracked the development of learned, anticipatory blinks, declining as learning progressed. Conversely, PV interneuron activity was coupled to locomotion, a proxy for arousal, following the aversive stimulus but was absent during the predictive cue window. Nicotinic cholinergic signaling selectively modulated SST responses. These results demonstrate a functional dissociation: SST interneurons refine predictive motor responses, while PV interneurons process affective arousal. This reveals a fundamental division of labor within cortical microcircuits for segregating and integrating distinct dimensions of learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.