Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Marta Tiemblo-MartinDepartment of Chemical Sciences and Task Force for Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II Via Cinthia 4 Naples 80126 Italy flaviana.dilorenzo@unina.it silipo@unina.it.
Marcello MercoglianoDepartment of Chemical Sciences and Task Force for Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II Via Cinthia 4 Naples 80126 Italy flaviana.dilorenzo@unina.it silipo@unina.it.
Kaisa HiippalaHuman Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki Haartmaninkatu 8 (P O Box 63) 00014 Finland.
Luca De Simone CaroneDepartment of Chemical Sciences and Task Force for Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II Via Cinthia 4 Naples 80126 Italy flaviana.dilorenzo@unina.it silipo@unina.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1086-2651
Maria MasielloDepartment of Chemical Sciences and Task Force for Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II Via Cinthia 4 Naples 80126 Italy flaviana.dilorenzo@unina.it silipo@unina.it.
Alessandro CangianoDepartment of Chemical Sciences and Task Force for Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II Via Cinthia 4 Naples 80126 Italy flaviana.dilorenzo@unina.it silipo@unina.it.
Antonio MolinaroDepartment of Chemical Sciences and Task Force for Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II Via Cinthia 4 Naples 80126 Italy flaviana.dilorenzo@unina.it silipo@unina.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3456-7369
Luigi PaduanoDepartment of Chemical Sciences and Task Force for Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II Via Cinthia 4 Naples 80126 Italy flaviana.dilorenzo@unina.it silipo@unina.it.
Reetta SatokariHuman Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki Haartmaninkatu 8 (P O Box 63) 00014 Finland.
Flaviana Di LorenzoDepartment of Chemical Sciences and Task Force for Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II Via Cinthia 4 Naples 80126 Italy flaviana.dilorenzo@unina.it silipo@unina.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-0114
Alba SilipoDepartment of Chemical Sciences and Task Force for Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II Via Cinthia 4 Naples 80126 Italy flaviana.dilorenzo@unina.it silipo@unina.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5394-6532
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.