ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2025
Monitoring of Nonsurgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis Traditional Measurement Methods and aMMP-8 Test Technology: A Pilot Study.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This pilot study investigated the effects of ≥6 weeks after nonsurgical treatment of the tissues surrounding dental implants, using clinical traditional methods and the aMMP-8 test technology in 39 patients. Methods and Materials: In the peri-implant pocket of 39 dental implants, an aMMP-8 concentration, gingival bleeding (BOP), and implant pocket depth (PPD), and an x-ray for radiologic bone level (RBL) were taken. The ≥6 weeks after nonsurgical treatment of the implants was carried out, and the treatment response was evaluated again after 30 days using the same methods. Results: The ≥6 weeks after nonsurgical treatment achieved a decrease in the aMMP-8 enzyme level, BOP, and the implant pockets. After 1 month, no statistically significant positive changes were observed in the result of the BOP ( Conclusions: Signs of inflammation were found to be very common in the tissues surrounding the implant. Getting the peri-implant tissue healthy in ≥6 weeks after nonsurgical treatment with traditional nonsurgical treatment would seem to be surprisingly challenging. The applicability of the aMMP-8 enzyme test in diagnosing and reading the real-time health status of the surrounding tissues in monitoring ≥6 weeks after nonsurgical treatments provides a useful and accurate method to control the health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.