ArticleNursing research and practice2025
A Qualitative Exploration of the Practice Learning Experiences of Third-Year Nursing Students: Challenges and Opportunities.
Article in Nursing research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study investigated the practice-based learning experiences of third-year nursing students under the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) Future Nurse Standards (2018). The study identified enablers and barriers to proficiency achievement and explored how these experiences inform their preparation for roles as registered nurses and future practice supervisors. Background: The study focused on nursing students who began their undergraduate programs in September 2020, the first cohort under the NMC Future Nurse Standards (2018). Conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, the research explored clinical practice learning experiences across three higher education institutions in England, highlighting the challenges in meeting required proficiencies. Design: A qualitative approach was used, underpinned by hermeneutic phenomenology. Focus group discussions with 17 final-year nursing students were undertaken. Methods: Thematic analysis was employed to explore shared experiences of practice-based learning. Ethical approval was obtained, and data saturation ensured robust findings. Results: Five themes emerged: the physical and emotional impact of practice learning, lack of confidence in the process of assessment due to inconsisteny, being prepared for practice, the impact of the practice supervisor/assessor, and what might help. Students described the process of achieving proficiencies as exhausting and emotionally draining, with assessment inconsistencies and limited supervisor engagement contributing to stress, isolation, and reduced learning opportunities. Conclusion: While students navigated the pandemic's impact on education, practice supervisors/assessors were seen as pivotal yet overstretched or insufficiently prepared. Findings highlight the need for standardized assessments, improved supervisor training, and tailored preplacement support to enhance practice-based learning and better prepare students for registration and future supervisory responsibilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.