ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Assessing the views and opinions of psychiatric patients receiving genome-guided treatment within the scope of the PREPARE preemptive pharmacogenomics clinical study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pharmacogenomics (PGx), an essential component of Personalized Medicine (PM), holds the potential to transform modern medical practice. While significant efforts have been made to enhance genomics education among healthcare professionals and explore the perspectives of various stakeholders, the understanding of patients' views on PGx remains relatively limited. Methods: Here we present findings from a cohort of 201 patients with various psychiatric illnesses enrolled in the PREPARE prospective PGx study, aiming to investigate their opinions and perceptions regarding the clinical adoption of PGx. Results: Although, 84% of respondents demonstrated a low level of PGx awareness and available tests, 99.5% strongly agreed that PGx testing reduces the occurrence and severity of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and improves decision-making for prescribing the most appropriate medication. Furthermore, 42.45% of patients who had previously experienced an ADR were significantly more likely to accept a tailored treatment plan based on physician guidance (p < 0.001), compared to 27.37% of those without ADRs. Discussion: Collectively, our data highlights the need for enhanced patient education and awareness about PGx testing and reflects an overall positive patient attitude towards genome-guided therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.