ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Gepants: targeting the CGRP pathway for migraine relief.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nose-to-Brain Nanocarriers for Migraine Management: A Comprehensive Review of Drug Delivery Strategies and Translational Challenges.Current medical science · 2026Review
- Multi-target-directed drugs: new additions in 2025 and post-marketing safety surveillance of drugs marketed in 2022-2024.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Review
- [Research progress on the role of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the repair of diabetic wounds].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Review
- Pediatric migraine: Neurodevelopmental mechanisms, clinical phenotypes, and modern therapeutics.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Review
- Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP): Biology, Signaling, Pathophysiological Roles, and Therapeutic Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Evaluating the efficacy of rimegepant as a preventive treatment for chronic and episodic migraine: a three-month longitudinal retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist (collectively known as gepant) have emerged as effective therapies for both acute migraine treatment and preventive management. Several new agents (atogepant, ubrogepant, rimegepant, and zavegepant) expand therapeutic options beyond traditional triptans and monoclonal antibodies. Objective: To summarize and critically evaluate the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety, and positioning of currently approved gepants for migraine treatment and prevention. Methods: A structured literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published from 1998 to September 2025. Search terms included "gepant," "CGRP receptor antagonist," "atogepant," "ubrogepant," "rimegepant," "zavegepant," "pharmacokinetics," "efficacy," and "safety," combined with Boolean operators. Peer-reviewed clinical studies providing data on pharmacology, efficacy, or safety were included; case reports, conference abstracts, and non-English articles were excluded. Results: Four gepants are currently approved for clinical use. Atogepant is indicated solely for prevention, while ubrogepant and zavegepant are approved for acute treatment; rimegepant is approved for both indications. All agents exhibit favorable pharmacokinetic profiles, with oral or intranasal formulations enabling rapid onset and convenient dosing. Across randomized controlled trials, gepants demonstrated significant reductions in monthly migraine days for prevention and high rates of 2-h pain freedom in acute treatment compared with placebo. Safety profiles were generally benign, with mild adverse events such as nausea and fatigue and no evidence of vasoconstriction or hepatotoxicity in contemporary studies. Conclusion: Gepants represent a valuable advancement in migraine therapy, offering effective acute and preventive options with favorable tolerability, particularly for patients who cannot use triptans or who have cardiovascular risk factors. Ongoing studies will clarify long-term safety, real-world effectiveness, and potential roles in combination or sequential therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.