ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Key factors and tactical variations in Chinese national women's softball games: a machine learning-based identification.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study employs machine learning to analyze data from Chinese women's softball games, identifying key factors determining game outcomes. It explores patterns in how different teams develop winning strategies. Method: This study analyzed data from 81 of 296 games conducted between 2023 and 2024, using game outcomes (win = 1, loss = 0) as the target variable and 98 features as inputs. Machine learning models, including Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, KNN, and SVM, were implemented in Python and trained on a 7:3 train-test split. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, F1-score, accuracy, precision, and recall to identify the best-performing model. SHAP and PDP were then employed to evaluate feature contributions to game outcome predictions. Results: The RF model achieved the highest accuracy on the test set with an AUC of 97.7% (95% CI: 0.938, 0.993). We identified the ten features that had the most significant impact on game results, including P-ER, OBP, RBI, and AVG. PDP analysis further revealed that an increase in P-ER and P-H significantly increased the probability of losing; improvements in OBP and AVG substantially increased the chances of winning. Different teams exhibited varying strategic emphases in their decisive factors: Team SC relied heavily on pitching performance, while SH, LN, and JS prioritized batting strategies. Conclusion: Feature importance analysis from the RF model indicates that P-ER and key batting metrics (e.g., OBP, AVG)are significantly associated with predicting game outcomes. These findings highlight their importance in predictive models, though further research is needed to confirm their practical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.