SynthesisFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Long-term athlete development in schools: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptive Athlete Management in Youth Football: A Developmentally Informed Framework for Applied Practice.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Evidence systematically assessing the effects of sports schools on long-term athlete development is largely lacking. In general, sport schools play an increasingly important role in the development of new Olympic and top athletes. Additionally, talent programmes for the context of schools are a strategy for identifying and developing talent in sport. Both approaches are designed to promote long-term development of talent in sport, but benefits remain unclear. This study examines the development of athletes in the school environment within the framework of Long-Term Athlete Development (LTAD). Methods: A systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, SportDiscus was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, incorporating the PICO strategy. Eligible trials were selected by (i) studies conducted in school (ii) including pupils (iii) conducting a quantitative design (iv) providing physiological, physical, psychological and social data, as well as sporting and academic results. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Findings were synthesized narratively. Results: Based on 21 studies, talent-development approaches in schools positively impact physiological and physical aspects. In four studies, authors noted increased psychological stress, with female student-athletes more frequently affected. Two studies found no negative impact on short-term academic success, whereas two reported lower long-term educational outcomes for sport profile pupils.No consistent link was found between talent programmes and long-term sporting success. Although athletes reported enhanced social support and stronger relationships with coaches and peers, the competing demands of academics and sport frequently caused social isolation beyond the sports school context. Conclusion: This narrative synthesis provides a comprehensive understanding of school-based talent development approaches on LTAD. Talent development programmes in schools support physical performance, social networks, and short-term academic success, but pose challenges for psychological aspects and long-term academic and sporting success. Better alignment with long-term athlete development aspects, including mental health support, is needed. Due to the heterogeneous methodologies applied, a systematic approach for pooled data synthesis was not feasible. Future research should address long-term outcomes and close methodological gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.