Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41357796›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Exploring diversity: a review of animal models for investigating variations in sex characteristics.

Gabriela de Faria Oliveira, Thomas Niepsuj, Arushi Gupta, Anthony P Auger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriela de Faria OliveiraWisconsin National Primate Research Center, Madison, WI, United States.
Thomas NiepsujWNPRC and Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Arushi GuptaWNPRC and Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Anthony P AugerWNPRC and Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Funding

WNPRC Supplemental Request for Nonhuman Primate Enclosures to Equip HIV/AIDS-Related Research FacilitiesP51OD011106 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinska · 2012 to 2026
$150.7M
Integrated Program in Endocrinology Translational Postdoctoral Training ProgramT32HD101384 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI IAN M. BIRD, Jon E Levine · 2021 to 2026
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD101384NIH HHS P51 OD011106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examines mechanisms across various organisms to enhance comprehension of Variations in Sex Characteristics (VSCs) and suggests suitable models for investigation. VSCs are the result of a collection of congenital conditions characterized by atypical development of both internal and external reproductive structures. These conditions may arise from variations in genes, developmental processes, and hormonal influences. Animal models are crucial for studying VSCs due to their ability to provide valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms in which sexual differentiation exists. Comparative research across species has further emphasized the nature of certain sex-determining genes and pathways, providing a broader understanding of the evolutionary conservation of sexual differentiation mechanisms. By integrating findings from diverse animal models, encompassing the genetic, molecular, and comparative perspective, this review seeks to provide a cohesive understanding of the complex processes underlying VSCs in animals, with implications for translational research and potential treatments.

Indexed as

animal modelssex characteristicssex differencessexual differentiationVSCs

Identifiers

PMID41357796
PMCPMC12678262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.