ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
'Pretty devastating': exploring horse owner and veterinarian lived experiences of the equine Hendra virus.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hendra and Nipah viruses: Biosafety evidence for risk-based containment, inactivation practices, and one health preparedness.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- The importance of qualitative social science research for informed public health policy at local and national levels: insights from a local health district in New South Wales, Australia.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With more than 60% of emerging infectious diseases being zoonotic, we apply a One Health lens that connects human, animal, and environmental dimensions of the response to a Hendra virus (HeV) event. One Health promotes collaboration among health professionals, veterinarians, environmental scientists, and policymakers to strengthen health infrastructure and improve responses to complex health threats. HeV is an uncommon high-consequence and potentially fatal zoonotic disease endemic to parts of Australia. Previous research has largely focused on the uptake of preparedness measures by veterinarians and horse owners and less is known about the emotional and experiential factors that may influence their behaviours. Methods: This study applied Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis to examine how horse owners and veterinarians experience, interpret, and act on HeV risk within a One Health frame of reference. Our aim was to characterise lived experiences at the human-animal-system interface and identify actionable, cross-sector recommendations. We conducted semi-structured interviews with eight horse owners and five veterinarians in a regional area of northern New South Wales, Australia. Results: Results identified four superordinate themes from the horse owners and two overarching themes from veterinarians. Findings highlight the emotional complexity of recognising and responding to HeV, including grief responses, and implications for future public health strategies. The need for comprehensive support structures underscored by public health liaison with a trusted general practitioner and dedicated access to mental health practitioners experienced in emergency and crisis contexts emerged as an important finding. A need for clear guidance for managing uncertain or deteriorating equine health was identified. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate how qualitative social science, applied within a One Health framework, can inform targeted messaging, policy considerations and cross-sector responses to emerging zoonoses, including HeV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.