ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025
Clinical and Economic Burden of COPD in Patients on Inhaled Triple Therapy in Germany - A Retrospective Claims Data Analysis.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Profiles and Disease Burden of Patients with COPD Initiating Triple Therapy in China.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Observational
- Addressing the Most Critical Challenges in COPD: An Expert Review of Emotional, Economic, and Evidence-Based Perspectives.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: This study describes the pharmacological treatment as well as the clinical and economic burden of disease in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients initiating triple therapy (TT) defined as a combination of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in Germany. Patients and Methods: All COPD patients aged 40 years and older in an anonymized claims database who initiated TT in 2017 were included. Adherence to TT and the use of the guideline-recommended escalation therapies were measured during two years of follow-up. We also describe the number of exacerbations, healthcare resource utilization, and direct healthcare costs observed during the follow-up. Results are reported for the total study population and a subgroup adherent to TT. Results: Of the 3,458,989 insured individuals in 2017, 6,532 initiated TT. Cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, and psychiatric comorbidities were common. Only one in six patients was adherent to TT over two years and one third experienced exacerbations; 18% had one exacerbation, 7% had two, 3% had three and 5% had four or more exacerbations during the follow-up. Both COPD-related and all-cause healthcare costs increased with the number of exacerbations during follow-up, as did the proportion of COPD-related costs among all healthcare costs. Mean all-cause costs per person-year of follow-up were €8,110 for patients without and €20,832 for patients with four or more exacerbations, respectively. Escalation therapy with roflumilast, which is recommended in German guidelines, was prescribed to 3.1% of patients, of whom two-thirds discontinued the drug during the two-year follow-up. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of COPD patients initiating TT experience exacerbations resulting in high resource utilization and costs for the healthcare system. With poor treatment adherence and rare use of guideline-recommended escalation therapies, effective new treatments are needed to address the unmet medical need in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.