Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41357719›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Uterine Perforation With a Uterine Balloon Tamponade During the Management of Secondary Postpartum Haemorrhage.

Mona M Hersi Farah, Meena Nayagam, Magdalena Szybka, Hannah Missfelder-Lobos, Helen Bolton, Norman Shreeve

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mona M Hersi FarahObstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.
Meena NayagamFamily Medicine, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.
Magdalena SzybkaMedicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.
Hannah Missfelder-LobosObstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.
Helen BoltonGynaecologic-Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.
Norman ShreeveObstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) continues to be a significant global challenge in maternal health. Effective and timely management is essential to prevent severe morbidity and mortality. Postpartum haemorrhage is classified as primary or secondary. Management options include medical, mechanical, and surgical interventions; uterine balloon tamponade is a mechanical method used to control bleeding. We present an atypical case of secondary PPH in a 36-year-old multiparous woman with an uncomplicated antenatal course who experienced a spontaneous vaginal delivery complicated by manual removal of the placenta and primary PPH with an estimated blood loss of 3500 ml. She later presented with recurrent secondary PPH, prompting transfer to a regional tertiary care centre for further investigation. Imaging and multidisciplinary evaluation revealed uterine perforation associated with a uterine balloon tamponade. Surgical intervention via midline laparotomy was performed for uterine repair. This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for uterine injury in persistent or atypical secondary PPH, particularly when mechanical interventions such as balloon tamponade are employed. Early recognition and multidisciplinary management are critical to optimising outcomes. A literature review is included to contextualise this rare but serious complication.

Indexed as

bakri balloonct imaging perforated uterusmidline emergency laparotomypostpartum haemorrhage (pph)secondary postpartum hemorrhage (pph)uterine perforation

Identifiers

PMID41357719
PMCPMC12680439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.