ArticleCureus2025
Uterine Perforation With a Uterine Balloon Tamponade During the Management of Secondary Postpartum Haemorrhage.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Laparoscopy vs. Laparotomy for Management of Postpartum Complications-A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) continues to be a significant global challenge in maternal health. Effective and timely management is essential to prevent severe morbidity and mortality. Postpartum haemorrhage is classified as primary or secondary. Management options include medical, mechanical, and surgical interventions; uterine balloon tamponade is a mechanical method used to control bleeding. We present an atypical case of secondary PPH in a 36-year-old multiparous woman with an uncomplicated antenatal course who experienced a spontaneous vaginal delivery complicated by manual removal of the placenta and primary PPH with an estimated blood loss of 3500 ml. She later presented with recurrent secondary PPH, prompting transfer to a regional tertiary care centre for further investigation. Imaging and multidisciplinary evaluation revealed uterine perforation associated with a uterine balloon tamponade. Surgical intervention via midline laparotomy was performed for uterine repair. This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for uterine injury in persistent or atypical secondary PPH, particularly when mechanical interventions such as balloon tamponade are employed. Early recognition and multidisciplinary management are critical to optimising outcomes. A literature review is included to contextualise this rare but serious complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.