Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41357718›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Cystitis Glandularis: A 10-Year Institutional Experience and Review of the Literature.

Nawal Khan, Yasmin Abu Ghanem, Wen Ng, Rajesh Nair, Elsie Mensah, Ramesh Thurairaja, Muhammad S Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nawal KhanUrology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Yasmin Abu GhanemUrology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Wen NgPathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Rajesh NairUrology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Elsie MensahUrology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Ramesh ThurairajaUrology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Muhammad S KhanUrology, King's College London, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospitals, King's Health Partners, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims Cystitis glandularis (CG) and cystitis cystica et glandularis (CCEG) are benign proliferative lesions of the bladder that may closely mimic carcinoma on imaging, cystoscopy, and histology. Their natural history and malignant potential remain uncertain, which can make management challenging for urologists. This study aimed to analyze the clinical behavior and malignant potential of CG and CCEG by reviewing a decade of institutional experience alongside current literature. Methods This retrospective observational review of all patients diagnosed with CG, cystitis cystica, or CCEG at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital was conducted over a 10-year period. Demographic data (including age, sex, ethnicity, and relevant clinical history), presenting symptoms, imaging and cystoscopic findings, histopathology, treatment, and follow-up information were collected. The published literature was reviewed with a focus on histological features, immunohistochemistry, molecular findings, and the possible association with malignancy. Results Sixty-seven patients were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 61 years (range: 39-84 years), and 57 (85.1%) were male. The most common presentations were lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS; 28.4%), visible hematuria (20.9%), and non-visible hematuria (16.4%). Cystitis glandularis was present in 30 (44.8%) patients, and intestinal-type metaplasia in 16 (23.9%) patients. Cystitis cystica was found in 53 cases (79.1%), and was associated with urothelial carcinoma in six (9.0%) patients. Lesions most frequently involved the bladder neck or trigone (62.7%). Median follow-up was 9.2 years (range: 2.2-17.8 years). No patient in this series developed de novo carcinoma arising from CG or CCEG during surveillance. Two patients with extensive trigonal involvement and upper tract obstruction underwent robot-assisted bilateral ureteric reimplantation. Conclusion CG and CCEG are usually benign conditions but can be difficult to distinguish from primary adenocarcinoma of the bladder, especially when intestinal-type metaplasia or mucus extravasation is present. The intestinal variant, particularly when extensive or associated with dysplasia, has been proposed as a potential premalignant lesion. Molecular studies show some overlap in gene expression profiles between CG and urothelial carcinoma, but clinical series have not consistently demonstrated an increased risk of progression. Management is centered on relief of underlying irritation, endoscopic resection of mass-like lesions, and surveillance in selected cases. In patients with extensive disease causing obstruction, reconstructive procedures, such as ureteric reimplantation or, rarely, cystectomy, may be required.

Indexed as

adenocarcinomabladdercystitis cysticacystitis glandularisintestinal metaplasiaurology

Identifiers

PMID41357718
PMCPMC12681343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.