ReviewIranian journal of public health2025
Utilization and Effectiveness of the PRECEDE-PROCEED Model as a Tool in Public Health Interventions: A Systematic Review.
Review in Iranian journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ischemic stroke in Peru: a scoping review of trends, outcomes, and evidence gaps.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The PRECEDE-PROCEED Model (PPM) is a theoretical tool for comprehensively assessing population health priorities and practically guiding the planning, implementation, and evaluation of interventions. We aimed to analyze systematically the extent of PPM utilization in the development and evaluation of public health interventions and to appraise the effectiveness of PPM-based interventions. Methods: PUBMED, Web of Science, ELSEVIER, EBSCO, and SCOPUS were systematically searched to identify relevant peer-reviewed studies from inception to June 2024. Data were extracted on study objectives, design, population, PPM utilization, interventions, and outcomes. Qualitative synthesis was performed to analyze how PPM was applied, to identify recurring themes, and to assess intervention effectiveness. Results: A total of 54 studies were included, of which 51 reported effective outcomes. These studies spanned 11 domains including disease prevention and control, healthy behaviors, preventing domestic violence, and so on. Education and ecological assessment was most frequently adopted (96%) in the PRECEDE stage, and outcome assessment was most commonly adopted (94%) in the PROCEED phase. All studied interventions incorporated health education. Nine key intervention elements were identified including sustained implementation, adequate duration, multiple educational topics, diverse formats, social support, providing educational materials, participant interaction, intervention monitoring, and practice support. Participant interaction was most frequently utilized (85%), whereas practice support was least frequently used (54%). Conclusion: Our findings highlight the importance of educational and ecological assessment in the PRECEDE stage and outcome evaluation in the PROCEDE phase for effective intervention design and assessment. Future PPM-based interventions should consider the nine identified core elements, with emphasis tailored to the specific health domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.