ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Advancements in injection materials for submucosal lifting in endoscopic interventions.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection rely on submucosal injection cushions to effectively separate lesions from the muscularis propria, thereby expanding the operative field, improving resection precision, and minimizing procedure-related complications. Although recent advances have yielded cushions with enhanced lift durabilities and biofunctional properties, their widespread clinical adoption remains limited. Key barriers include poor injectability, uncertain long-term biocompatibility, restricted multifunctionality, manufacturing and supply chain constraints, and a lack of robust clinical and reimbursement evidence. This article comprehensively evaluated the current submucosal injection materials and assessed their mechanical performance, biocompatibility, and intraoperative usability. It compares conventional agents with emerging functionalized materials, identifies critical translational hurdles, and proposes actionable strategies to overcome them. These include the implementation of standardized biosafety protocols, early engagement with regulatory agencies, optimization of production processes, and incorporation of clinical and cost-effectiveness analyses. Bridging the gap between laboratory innovation and routine clinical use requires coordinated efforts across biomaterial research, industrial scalability, regulatory science, and health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.