ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Application of ultrasound-guided localization technology in early gastric cancer surgery and prognostic analysis.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe current study was to assess the application effects of conventional surgical techniques and ultrasound-guided precise localization technology for early gastric cancer (EGC), with an emphasis on long-term survival, postoperative complications, and surgical results.
aimTo evaluate perioperative results, postoperative complications, and long-term survival in order to conduct a thorough comparison between conventional surgical techniques and ultrasound-guided precise localization technology for the treatment of EGC.
methodsOf 100 EGC patients were gathered, and they were subsequently divided into two groups based on the surgical technique used: The observation group (
resultsCompared with the control group, the observation group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (80 mL
conclusionIt is possible that ultrasound-guided accurate localization technology might be utilized more widely in clinical practice because it could significantly enhance the results of surgery for EGC, including reduced blood loss, better lymphadenectomy, lower complication rates, and improved survival rates. Further studies should aim to refine this technology and consider its utility in other types of oncologic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.