Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41357644›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025

Effectiveness of different appendiceal stump closure methods in laparoscopic appendectomy in children: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Waleed A Elsayed, Sayed Ahmed Elhadi, Dalia Gad, Hanan Mahmoud Mohamed, Tarig Elsaid, Mahmoud Fahmy Omar, Ahmad Abdullah Almousa, Ahmed Elkhouly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Waleed A ElsayedDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, King Fahd Hospital of University, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Khobar 34447, Saudi Arabia. wasayed@iau.edu.sa.
Sayed Ahmed ElhadiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Damietta 34511, Egypt.
Dalia GadDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11511, Egypt.
Hanan Mahmoud MohamedDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11511, Egypt.
Tarig ElsaidPediatric Surgery Department, Maternity and Children Hospital Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, Tabuk 43200, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud Fahmy OmarDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Royal Commission Hospital, Al Jubayl 35417, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad Abdullah AlmousaDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Commission Hospital, Aljubail 35417, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed ElkhoulyPediatric Surgery Department, Maternity and Children Hospital Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, Tabuk 43200, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the standard treatment for acute appendicitis in children, offering reduced postoperative pain and quicker recovery compared to open surgery. A critical aspect of LA is the secure closure of the appendiceal stump to avoid complications such as leakage and abscess formation. Various closure techniques are employed, including endoloops (ELs), staplers, clips, and energy devices; however, the optimal method remains unclear due to inconsistent evidence.

aimTo systematically evaluate and rank the effectiveness and safety of different appendiceal stump closure techniques used in pediatric LA. By assessing outcomes such as postoperative complications, operative time, and length of hospital stay, this analysis seeks to provide evidence-based guidance to clarify clinical decision-making and optimize patient care.

methodsThis systematic review and network meta-analysis, conducted according to PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines, compared the effectiveness and safety of stump closure methods in pediatric LA. Databases searched included PubMed, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Scopus up to May 1, 2025. Eligible studies included both randomized and non-randomized designs reporting surgical outcomes in pediatric patients. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A frequentist network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was conducted using R software to evaluate total complications (primary outcome), as well as operative time and hospital stay (secondary outcomes).

resultsFourteen studies comprising over 50000 pediatric patients were included in the network meta-analysis comparing appendiceal stump closure techniques in LA. No significant differences in total postoperative complications or hospital stay were observed among techniques, including EL, endostapler, polymer clip, LigaSure, harmonic scalpel (HS), and sutures. HS showed a statistically significant reduction in operative time compared to EL (mean difference: -13.5 minutes), while other methods did not demonstrate significant time savings. No technique was associated with a statistically significant increase or decrease in postoperative complications or length of stay. Publication bias was minimal, and the methodological quality of included studies was moderate to good.

conclusionWhile all closure techniques show similar safety profiles, HS offers shorter operating times. These findings support tailoring stump closure method selection based on operative efficiency and resource availability.

Indexed as

Appendiceal stump closureAppendicitisEndo loopEndo-staplerPediatric laparoscopic appendectomy

Identifiers

PMID41357644
PMCPMC12678993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.