ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2025
Sustainable Solutions for Eye Drop Plastic Waste: Challenges, Innovations, and Environmental Impact.
Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread use of single-use plastic eye drop bottles in ophthalmology presents a significant environmental challenge. While essential for preventing contamination and ensuring patient safety, these bottles contribute to plastic waste due to their small size, multimaterial composition, and inadequate recycling infrastructure. This review examines the environmental impact of eye drop packaging across various ophthalmic conditions, including dry eye disease, cataract surgery, and glaucoma, highlighting the substantial cumulative burden of plastic waste and carbon emissions. The manuscript explores innovative solutions to mitigate this environmental footprint without compromising clinical standards. Key strategies discussed include product redesign using biodegradable materials, the adoption of multidose preservative-free systems, and the development of alternative drug delivery technologies like punctal plugs. Additionally, the importance of advanced recycling initiatives, such as specialized take-back programs, is emphasized. The paper also underscores the need for behavioral, institutional, and policy interventions, including educational campaigns, sustainable procurement practices, and the implementation of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) policies. By integrating these multifaceted approaches, the field of ophthalmology can align the critical priorities of patient safety and environmental sustainability, fostering a transition towards greener practices while maintaining high standards of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.