ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025
Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 (application EFSA-GMO-ES-2017-147).
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetically Modified Lactic Acid Bacteria in the EU Food Chain: Applications, Benefits, and Risk Assessment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 (application EFSA-GMO-ES-2017-147).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 was developed by crossing to combine four single events: GHB614, T304-40, GHB119 and COT102. The four-event-stack cotton expresses 2mEPSPS, Cry1Ab, Cry2Ae, Vip3Aa19 and PAT/bar to confer herbicide tolerance and insect resistance. Furthermore, event COT102 expresses the antimicrobial APH4 protein used during its molecular development. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single cotton events and did not identify safety concerns. Since then, no new data on the single cotton events were identified that would require modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment does not indicate interactions which would give rise to new food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four-event stack cotton, as described in this application, is as safe as its non-GM comparator and non-GM cotton varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of release of processed cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 or accidental spillage of viable GM cotton seeds into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102. The GMO Panel concludes that four-event stack cotton is as safe as its non-GM comparator and the tested non-GM cotton varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.