Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41357533›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025

Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 (application EFSA-GMO-ES-2017-147).

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), Josep Casacuberta, Francisco Barro, Albert Braeuning, Ruud de Maagd, Michelle M Epstein, Thomas Frenzel, Jean-Luc Gallois, Frits Koning, Antoine Messéan and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
Josep Casacuberta
Francisco Barro
Albert Braeuning
Ruud de Maagd
Michelle M Epstein
Thomas Frenzel
Jean-Luc Gallois
Frits Koning
Antoine Messéan
F Javier Moreno
Fabien Nogué
Giovanni Savoini
Alan H Schulman
Christoph Tebbe
Eve Veromann
Michele Ardizzone
Giacomo De Sanctis
Antonio Fernandez Dumont
Andrea Gennaro
José Ángel Gómez Ruiz
Tilemachos Goumperis
Dafni Maria Kagkli
Paolo Lenzi
Ana M Camargo
Franco Maria Neri
Pietro Piffanelli
Tommaso Raffaello

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 was developed by crossing to combine four single events: GHB614, T304-40, GHB119 and COT102. The four-event-stack cotton expresses 2mEPSPS, Cry1Ab, Cry2Ae, Vip3Aa19 and PAT/bar to confer herbicide tolerance and insect resistance. Furthermore, event COT102 expresses the antimicrobial APH4 protein used during its molecular development. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single cotton events and did not identify safety concerns. Since then, no new data on the single cotton events were identified that would require modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment does not indicate interactions which would give rise to new food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four-event stack cotton, as described in this application, is as safe as its non-GM comparator and non-GM cotton varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of release of processed cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 or accidental spillage of viable GM cotton seeds into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102. The GMO Panel concludes that four-event stack cotton is as safe as its non-GM comparator and the tested non-GM cotton varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

Indexed as

COT102cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)genetic engineeringGHB119GHB614GMGossypium barbadenseimport and processingT304‐40

Identifiers

PMID41357533
PMCPMC12679044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.