ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Virtual reality for delirium prevention in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing challenges for virtual reality applications in the ICU.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Progress of nursing management for delirium in critically ill geriatric patients: a narrative review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the advantages, applications and shortcomings of virtual reality technology in the prevention of delirium in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation, and to provide references for clinical practice and research in this field. Methods: This study adopted the narrative review method and systematically retrieved nine databases and related websites including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biomedical Literature Service System, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP database. It aims to collect relevant Chinese and English literature published before April 30, 2025. This study reviews the application, effect and evaluation of virtual reality technology in the prevention of delirium in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation. Results: Virtual reality technology can effectively alleviate patients' negative emotions, enhance the interest and compliance of early activities, and have a positive impact on cognitive functions such as working memory by providing immersive experiences, thereby reducing the risk of delirium from multiple dimensions. Existing evidence indicates that this technology has basic safety and feasibility in such critically ill patients. However, current research generally has limitations such as small sample size, lack of support from high-quality randomized controlled trials, relatively single virtual reality content, insufficient personalization, and insufficient validation of the reliability and validity of related usability evaluation tools in the ICU population. Conclusion: Virtual reality technology has shown significant potential in preventing delirium in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation. Future research should focus on constructing systematic and individualized virtual reality intervention programs, developing and verifying assessment tools suitable for local ICU patients, and further clarifying its long-term efficacy, optimal implementation model and cost-effectiveness through multi-center large-sample studies, so as to promote the standardized application and clinical transformation of this technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.