ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Efficacy and influencing factors of immunosuppressive therapy combined with or without eltrombopag in children with severe aplastic anemia.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eltrombopag Combined With Cyclosporine A in the Treatment of Pediatric Patients With SAA: Establishing the Range for Eltrombopag Concentrations.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Real-world use of thrombopoietic agents in treatment-naïve children with severe aplastic anemia: a multicenter retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To compare the efficacy of eltrombopag (EPAG) combined with standard immunosuppressive therapy (IST), EPAG with cyclosporine or cyclosporine alone in children with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Methods: This is a retrospective study. The patients were categorized as three groups: Group A (EPAG + rabbit antithymocyte globulin + cyclosporine, Results: There was no significant difference in the ORR among Groups A, B, and C at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months ( Conclusion: EPAG combined with IST shows comparable efficacy to cyclosporine alone in children with SAA, along with a favorable safety profile. Patients with earlier initiation of EPAG and preserved residual hematopoietic function are more likely to achieve remission, without serious adverse reactions or significant clonal evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.