ArticleFrontiers in radiology2025
Targeting the invisible: precision fiducial marker placement in poorly visible liver tumors prior to percutaneous ablation using real-time image fusion guidance.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and accuracy of fiducial marker placement using US-CT/MRI fusion imaging guidance in poorly conspicuous liver tumors prior to percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA). Method: From January 2016 to February 2018, 30 consecutive patients with 38 liver lesions that were poorly or not visible on conventional ultrasound underwent fiducial marker placement under real-time US-CT/MRI fusion imaging before the PTA procedure. Marker position was confirmed via CT or MRI immediately after placement. The shortest distance between the marker and the edge of the target lesion, the lesion size, and the depth were measured. The fiducial marker placement was considered successful if the marker was within, in contact or ≤5 mm distance from the lesion; a distance >5 mm was considered a failure. Results: Of the 38 lesions, 28 (74%) were undetectable using ultrasound alone, while 10 (26%) were not confidently identified. After fusion, 26 lesions (68%) showed enhanced visibility, while 12 (32%) remained undetectable. Overall, the mean distance between the fiducial marker and the lesion's edge was 4 mm (range: 0-45 mm). Successful placement was achieved in 30 lesions (79%): 27, inside or in contact, and 3, at a <5 mm distance from the target lesion. Placement was unsuccessful in eight lesions (21%). No procedure-related complications occurred. Conclusions: The present work suggests that pre-PTA placement of a fiducial marker in poorly visible tumors using real-time US-CT/MRI fusion imaging is accurate, potentially enhancing the effectiveness of subsequent PTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.