ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Periodontal and prosthetic perspective of implant-supported full-arch prostheses with monolithic zirconia and porcelain fused metal restorative materials: A three-year retrospective case series.
Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monolithic Zirconia Versus Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region: 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Trial
- Minimally Invasive Implant Rehabilitation in Geriatric Patients: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Contemporary Strategies to Avoid Extensive Bone Augmentation Procedures.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Full-mouth implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation for failing dentition is a complex, multifactorial process influenced by prosthetic materials and peri-implant periodontal health. Traditionally, porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) frameworks have ensured functional stability and acceptable esthetics; however, the advent of monolithic zirconia layered with porcelain has introduced enhanced mechanical strength and esthetic appeal. This retrospective case series evaluated the 3-year clinical outcomes of full-arch implant-supported prostheses fabricated using either monolithic zirconia or PFM in edentulous patients, focusing on peri-implant soft-tissue health, marginal bone loss, and prosthetic complications. Ten edentulous patients rehabilitated with full-arch implant-supported prostheses were included and assessed clinically and radiographically for peri-implant tissue health, plaque accumulation, probing depth, bleeding on probing, marginal bone levels, and technical complications over a 3-year follow-up. Both prosthetic materials demonstrated stable peri-implant tissue health and 100% implant survival at the 3-year mark. Monolithic zirconia restorations exhibited reduced plaque accumulation, stable bone levels, and absence of prosthetic complications, whereas the PFM group showed minor technical issues such as porcelain chipping and screw loosening. Within the limitations of this study, both materials proved clinically viable for full-arch implant rehabilitation; however, monolithic zirconia showed a trend toward superior biological and mechanical outcomes. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to validate these preliminary findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.