ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dentinal hypersensitivity is a common disorder in dental practice, with existing treatments often offering only transient relief. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has emerged as a promising option owing to its prolonged pain-suppressing effects and growing patient acceptance. Objective: This study aimed to assess the immediate and sustained efficacy of LLLT, fluoride varnish, and desensitizing paste in treating dentinal hypersensitivity. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 participants were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: Group I (LLLT), Group II (fluoride varnish), and Group III (arginine calcium carbonate paste). Evaluation using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and numerical rating scale (NRS) occurred immediately after the first application, at 1 week, after the second application, and at 15 days, 1 month, and 3 months. Clinical parameters, including plaque index (PI) and clinical attachment level (CAL), were assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. Results: Intergroup comparisons revealed a statistically significant difference at later time points (15 days, 1 month, and 3 months), with LLLT demonstrating superior efficacy in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity compared to the other two interventions. Intragroup comparisons for clinical parameters PI and CAL exhibited statistically significant differences. However, intergroup comparisons for both clinical parameters did not indicate any statistically significant differences. Conclusion: This study's findings suggest that LLLT offers greater and sustained reduction in dentinal hypersensitivity over a 3-month period, outperforming sodium fluoride varnish and arginine calcium carbonate paste.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.