ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Exploring AI-personalized visualization of the safe place in virtual reality versus imagination of the safe place for stress, burnout, and relaxation in psychotherapists: a case series.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Psychotherapists face substantial occupational stress and emotional demands placing them at risk of burnout, yet interventions aimed at enhancing their well-being remain understudied. This case series explored the effectiveness of a brief relaxation intervention comparing the traditional safe place imagination exercise with a virtual reality (VR) adaptation. The VR adaptation comprised a personalized visualization of the safe place by artificial intelligence (AI). The exploratory research questions investigated how both interventions would influence relaxation, burnout and stress over the course of the study and whether VR would yield different effects than imagination. Further, the roles of imagery ability and presence were explored. Methods: Five psychotherapists from an outpatient setting participated in a six-week, within-subject study that used an alternating treatments design (ABCABC) which was created via a participatory approach where participants actively engaged in the planning of the study. Imagination- (B) and VR-based (C) relaxation interventions alternated weekly with baseline weeks (A) in between. The VR environments were tailored to participants' preferences through generative AI. Results: Relaxation consistently increased in both conditions based on self-report and physiological (skin conductance levels) measures. Burnout and stress did not significantly decrease over time and VR did not yield significantly greater effects on all outcomes. Imagery ability was not associated with greater relaxation, whereas presence showed a positive correlation in one VR session. Conclusion: These findings suggest that brief imagination and VR interventions can enhance relaxation in psychotherapists. The lack of significant differences between conditions suggests that VR does not inherently outperform traditional methods, especially with participants already familiar with imagination exercises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.