ArticleWorld journal of transplantation2025
Incisional hernia repair following liver transplantation: A meta-analysis.
Article in World journal of transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimally invasive abdominal wall reconstruction with robotic-assisted transversus abdominis release following orthotopic liver transplant.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive liver transplantation: technical evolution, evidence maturity, and translational boundaries.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncisional hernia (IH) is a common complication following liver transplantation (LT), contributing to significant morbidity and impaired quality of life. The interplay of transplant-specific factors, patient comorbidities, surgical complexity, and immunosuppression presents considerable challenges in hernia repair, often accompanied by substantial risks.
aimTo assess the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of IH repair in LT recipients.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and PubMed, yielding 493 results. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, 39 studies reporting on IH following LT were included in the final analysis. Studies involving paediatric populations, hernias unrelated to transplant incisions, living liver donors, non-LT, and multi-organ transplants were excluded. Meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane RevMan software. The study has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024563398).
resultsA review of 39 studies revealed incidence of post-LT IH ranging from 1.7% to upto 42.8%. Pooled analysis showed comparable demographics among groups and post-LT IH incidence was higher in older age recipients [mean difference (MD) = 2.39, 95%CI: 1.15-3.63,
conclusionOlder recipient age, male gender, high BMI, Mercedes-Benz incision, and re-laparotomy after LT are significant risk factors for IH. In contrast, model for end-stage liver disease score, pre-LT ascites, acute rejection, and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor therapy do not appear to influence IH development. While open repair remains the predominant approach post-LT, no significant differences in recurrence or wound complication rates have been observed between open and laparoscopic repairs. However, open repair is associated with a shorter operative time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.