Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41357385›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of transplantation2025

Utility and limitations of the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA in kidney transplantation.

Maurizio Salvadori, Giuseppina Rosso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maurizio SalvadoriDepartment of Renal Transplantation, Careggi University Hospital, Florence 50139, Tuscany, Italy. maurizio.salvadori1@gmail.com.
Giuseppina RossoDepartment of Nephrology, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Florence 50143, Toscana, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the use of new biomarkers in different phases of the diagnosis and treatment of several diseases has allowed substantial improvement in clinical practice. The use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in organ transplantation has led to significant progress in the treatment of post-transplant outcomes, particularly after kidney transplantation. In addition, the use of dd-cfDNA in organ transplantation has led to significant advancements in post-transplant outcome monitoring. The aim of this study is to review many of the recent studies on the use of this biomarker and to evaluate its most relevant advantages and limitations. dd-cfDNA is released from several types of cells of the transplanted organ, most often from endothelial cells and this happens in the case of organ damage, most often rejection. Its presence in the bloodstream of the recipients is an important sign of graft damage; its principal advantage is in the avoidance of invasive tools such as renal biopsy. Additionally, several studies reported that the finding of dd-cfDNA in the serum may precede histological abnormalities; its utility in the diagnosis of subclinical rejection is extremely important. Among the principal limitations of this tool are the difficulty in distinguishing different forms of graft damage. According to several studies this tool has several limitations in diagnosing T-cell mediated rejection. In addition, particular care should be taken in distinguishing dd-cfDNA from recipient-derived cfDNA.

Indexed as

Advantages and disadvantagesAntibody mediated rejectionBiomarkersDonor-derived cell-free DNASubclinical rejectionT cell mediated rejection

Identifiers

PMID41357385
PMCPMC12679247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.