ReviewJournal of oral & maxillofacial research
Efficacy of Photobiomodulation on Neurosensory Recovery in Patients with Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury Due to Third Molar Extraction and Implant Surgery: a Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The primary objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of photobiomodulation in promoting neurosensory regeneration in patients with inferior alveolar nerve injury resulting from the extraction of mandibular third molars or dental implant placement. Material and Methods: An electronic search was conducted across major scientific databases including MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and a total of 10 studies were included for qualitative analysis. Results: A total of 10 studies were analysed, including 4 randomized clinical trials, 5 case series, and 1 retrospective study. All utilized GaAlAs lasers for photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy with wavelengths ranging from 808 to 830 nm. The number of treatment sessions ranged from 7 to 20, delivered at frequencies of 1, 2, or 3 times per week. Nearly all studies reported statistically significant improvements in both objective and subjective neurosensory assessments in favour of PBM therapy. Additionally, no significant differences were found between groups regarding sex, age, injury aetiology, or time to treatment initiation. Conclusions: Photobiomodulation shows promising potential in the neurosensory recovery of inferior alveolar nerve injuries. However, further randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up are needed to establish standardized clinical protocols and confirm its efficacy in dental practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.