ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
Development and validation of explainable deep learning models for classification of atrial fibrillation subtypes using cardiac computed tomography.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although cardiac computed tomography (CT) provides detailed anatomical information on the left atrial (LA), few studies have examined whether it can distinguish paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) from persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) based on structural features in an interpretable manner. Objective: To develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) model trained on LA morphology derived from cardiac CT for classifying atrial fibrillation (AF) subtypes and to identify spatial remodeling patterns associated with PerAF to enhance understanding of AF progression. Methods: We developed 3 types of 3-dimensional CNN to classify AF subtypes using cardiac CT-derived LA morphology. A total of 269 patients were used for model development with stratified 10-fold cross-validation. External validation was conducted in 151 independent patients. CNN performance was compared with LA volume and LA volume index from echocardiography and CT. We used gradient-weighted class activation mapping to identify regional remodeling patterns associated with predictions. Results: Among the 3-dimensional-CNN, the 3D-DenseNet201 model achieved the highest performance in internal validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.81 ± 0.08; accuracy 77.0 ± 6.2%) and maintained consistent accuracy in external validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.81 ± 0.01; accuracy 76.7 ± 1.6%). gradient-weighted class activation mapping revealed that PerAF classification was primarily driven by activation in the anterosuperior LA wall (72.8%), right superior pulmonary vein antrum (49.4%), and septum (44.3%). The posterior wall showed minimal activation. CNN outperformed echocardiographic or CT-derived volume metrics. Conclusion: The 3D-DenseNet201 model accurately classified AF subtypes and localized structural remodeling patterns relevant to PerAF. These findings highlight the potential of deep learning to improve the mechanistic understanding of AF progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.