ReviewJournal of food allergy2025
Oral food challenges in food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome: Practical considerations.
Review in Journal of food allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non IgE-mediated food allergy: Current knowledge and unmet needs.Journal of food allergy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-immunoglobulin E mediated food hypersensitivity disorder that primarily affects children in the first few years of life but may affect all ages. An FPIES diagnosis remains challenging due to the lack of specific biomarkers and is typically based on the clinical history and oral food challenges (OFC). Methods: This review examines the current literature on diagnosing primarily pediatric FPIES, indications and timing for OFCs, specific considerations for adult and atypical FPIES OFCs, management of co-reactive or cross-reactive foods, and factors that influence the location and approach for conducting OFCs. Results: An FPIES diagnosis includes meeting specific clinical criteria, with OFCs being the diagnostic standard in cases of diagnostic uncertainty. In the United States, OFCs are generally performed 12 to 18 months after the last reaction to a suspected trigger to assess for tolerance. Regional variations in trigger food prevalence and OFC timing were noted. Nutritional and cultural importance of the offending food, severity of previous reactions, and parental comfort are factors in deciding the timing and setting of OFCs. Management of potential co-reactive and cross-reactive foods remains variable, requiring cautious, supervised reintroduction. Conclusion: FPIES requires a careful diagnosis and management. OFC timing and approach should be tailored to individual patient needs and factor in past reaction severity and the importance of the food trigger in the regional diet and nutritional value. More research is needed to standardize OFC protocols. Enhanced guidelines and increased awareness among health-care providers can lead to more accurate diagnoses and better FPIES management, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.