Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41357254›Full record

ReviewJournal of food allergy2025

Eosinophilic esophagitis: Examining the impact of disease.

Thomas L Offerle, Nidhi R Talasani, Emily C McGowan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of food allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas L OfferleFrom the Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia and.
Nidhi R TalasaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine; Charlottesville, Virginia.
Emily C McGowanFrom the Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly common allergic and gastrointestinal condition affecting both children and adults. The objective of this review was to summarize the existing literature on the impact of EoE on quality of life, physical well-being, psychosocial functioning, and healthcare utilization. Methods: Literature searches were performed using PubMed. Keyword combinations included those representing eosinophilic esophagitis and quality of life (QOL), anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, financial impact, and healthcare utilization. Results: EoE impacts multiple facets of patients' lives, and this does not always correlate with endoscopic and histologic findings. QOL appears to be significantly associated with symptom burden, which can be influenced by symptom-specific anxiety and esophageal hypervigiliance. Patients with EoE also have increased health-care costs, which are primarily due to provider visits, diagnostic procedures, medications, disease complications, and "hidden costs." Conclusion: Providers caring for patients with EoE should be aware of the complex interplay between the emotional, mental, social, and financial impacts of this disease and consider them carefully during shared decision-making.

Indexed as

burden of diseaseeosinophilic esophagitisquality of life

Identifiers

PMID41357254
PMCPMC12680313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.