ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Unique antibodies across the animal kingdom (birds, camelids, and sharks): therapeutic potential against human respiratory viral infections.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Camelid VHHs as a Versatile Platform for Combating Viral Infections.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- IgY technology (egg yolk antibodies) in respiratory medicine: applications and future prospects.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Mechanisms and applications of camelid variable heavy-chain nanobodies against bacterial and parasitic protozoal pathogens.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibodies represent indispensable tools in the armamentarium against infectious diseases, with widespread application in prophylactic, therapeutic, and diagnostic settings. Conventional mammalian immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies have been extensively utilized in clinical and research contexts; however, their utility is sometimes constrained by intrinsic limitations such as thermal instability, susceptibility to proteolytic degradation, limited mucosal efficacy, and the high costs associated with mammalian expression systems. These challenges have driven increasing interest in alternative antibody formats derived from non-mammalian species that offer distinct structural and functional advantages. In recent years, a growing body of research has focused on non-canonical immunoglobulins, including immunoglobulin Y (IgY) from birds, nanobodies derived from the variable domain of heavy-chain-only antibodies (VHH) in camelids, and variable new antigen receptors (VNARs) sourced from the immunoglobulin new antigen receptor (IgNAR) system in cartilaginous fish such as sharks. The structural simplicity and functional robustness of these antibody platforms enable their integration into diverse biomedical applications, encompassing passive immunization, targeted drug delivery, and point-of-care diagnostics. Indeed, these molecules exhibit unique biochemical properties, including superior thermal and protease resistance, small molecular size, and the ability to access recessed or conformational epitopes that are often inaccessible to conventional IgG antibodies. Moreover, their typically lower immunogenic profiles and reduced pro-inflammatory activity render them suitable for a broad range of therapeutic strategies, including repeated administration and mucosal delivery, and position them as particularly promising agents for combating respiratory pathogens. This review highlights the unique properties, practical advantages, and translational therapeutic potential of IgY, nanobodies, and VNARs. It underscores their advantages over traditional antibody formats and their emerging role as next-generation Immunotherapeutics in the global effort to address persistent and emerging respiratory viral threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.