ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Effect of tDCS targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on psychophysiological responses and brain oxygenation during exercise in healthy adults: a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of transcranial photobiomodulation on performance and cardiovascular responses in trained cyclists.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Effects of external diaphragmatic nerve stimulation on diaphragm and cortical activity in stroke patients: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Physical inactivity is a major public health challenge, and strategies to improve exercise adherence are crucial. Affective responses play a key role in exercise behavior, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive technique that applies low-intensity current to the scalp, may modulate these responses. However, evidence supporting its effectiveness remains equivocal. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of tDCS targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on psychophysiological responses and brain oxygenation in healthy adults. Methods: Participants first completed a maximal incremental exercise test to assess exercise performance and aerobic fitness. In two subsequent sessions, participants received either active tDCS over the DLPFC or sham stimulation for 20 min, followed by a 20-min vigorous-intensity exercise session. Heart rate (HR) and brain oxygenation (measured via functional near-infrared spectroscopy, fNIRS) were continuously monitored during exercise. Affective valence, arousal, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were self-reported every 5 min. Data were analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations and Generalized Mixed Models, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Brain oxygenation increased after exercise compared to baseline and post-tDCS (p < 0.05). However, tDCS did not significantly alter brain oxygenation at rest (p > 0.3) or during exercise (p > 0.09). No significant effect of tDCS was observed for the affective responses (p > 0.08), arousal (p > 0.85), or RPE (leg: p > 0.90; whole-body: p > 0.28). Conclusion: DLPFC-targeted tDCS does not modulate brain oxygenation or enhance psychophysiological responses during vigorous-intensity exercise in healthy individuals. Future studies should explore exercise preference and tolerance, and the effects of tDCS on clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.