ArticleEvolution letters2025
The hidden threat: genetic load dynamics in tetraploids and diploids.
Article in Evolution letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyploids are organisms with three or more chromosome sets, which often give them different physiology, morphology, and evolutionary properties. The impact of polyploidy on the genetic load dynamics, in terms of accumulation, fixation, and purging of deleterious mutations, is largely unknown. Here, we use forward-in-time genomic simulations to compare the fitness effects of genetic load components assuming diploid and tetraploid populations under different demographic scenarios. Under partial recessiveness, we show that tetraploids tend to accumulate a higher genetic load than diploids in small and large populations, with negative consequences on their fitness. Under complete recessiveness, the same pattern is observed only in small populations, but similar load effects are found in large diploid and tetraploid populations under mutation-drift equilibrium. The only scenario where tetraploids suffered less from the effects of genetic load was in bottlenecked populations under complete recessiveness. Our results highlight the importance of factors such as demography, dominance and selection coefficients, and genetic drift in shaping the different patterns of accumulation of deleterious mutations in diploids and tetraploids. While some studies have suggested that tetraploids might have a reduced genetic load because recessive mutations could be masked more efficiently, our findings align more closely with evidence that tetraploids frequently accumulate a higher genetic load than diploids. This insight is significant for assessing the role of ploidy in the conservation of endangered species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.