ArticleEvolution letters2025
An early-life survival and reproductive trade-off shapes selection on body size.
Article in Evolution letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evolutionary trade-offs-opposing trait effects on total fitness via different fitness components-are likely to be widespread. Some key trade-offs are expected to be the result of chains of causation acting across an organism's lifetime. For example, a trait imparting reproductive benefits early in life may trade off against reduced survival to attain later-life reproductive opportunities. Tools in evolutionary quantitative genetics have recently been developed to formally characterize selection acting through different causal pathways throughout the life cycle and, therefore, to formally characterize evolutionary trade-offs. We use these methods to investigate a trade-off between early life reproduction and survival and how that trade-off affects selection on body size in the Soay sheep population inhabiting St Kilda (Outer Hebrides, Scotland). We decompose and quantify the total effects of first-year female body mass on lifetime fitness, with particular attention to the effect of body mass on early-life reproduction and the potential survival cost of early-life reproduction. Our results establish that the total effect of body mass on lifetime fitness is positive, despite the strong negative contribution acting via early life reproduction. Moreover, we show that the magnitude of the selection on body mass acting through different causal paths highly depends on population density. At higher densities, the cost of early-life reproduction is higher, and therefore, it contributes a strong negative component to the total selection of body mass-i.e., at higher population density, selection on body mass is weaker than it is when the population density is smaller. By decomposing total selection and quantifying selection acting through different causal paths, we expose the underlying mechanics shaping body mass in Soay sheep female lambs, and we provide a meaningful contribution to the understanding of the evolution of body size in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.