ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Machine learning-based screening of heart failure using the integrated features of electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram: a multicenter study in China.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgrounds: Heart failure (HF) is a major health concern associated with poor prognosis, and there is an urgent clinical need for an easy and accurate method for screening HF. This multicenter study aims to validate a novel AI-based phono-electrocardiogram algorithm (AI-PECG) in early HF detection. Methods: A total of 1,017 individuals were grouped into a training cohort and an external validating cohort, with a ratio of 8:2. In the training cohort, data of patients were further split into training set and test set randomly with the 8:2 ratio. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator with five-fold cross-validation was utilized for dimensionality reduction and selection of features for model construction from clinical variables, phonocardiogram (PCG) parameters and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters. Five machine learning (ML) algorithms were then carried out to choose a classifier model with the optimal recognition of HF, including logistic regression, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Category Boosting (CatBoost), and Naive Bayes. The importance of ranking predicted factors was calculated in the final screening model using the SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis. Results: Among eligible participants, 302 reported HF. Totally 17 variables were selected to conduct the screening models. In the training set, the area under the curve (AUC) of the CatBoost model was 0.998 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.996-1.000], which was higher compared to that of other ML models. The sensitivity and specificity of CatBoost model was 0.989 (95% CI: 0.978-0.996) and 0.989 (95% CI: 0.979-0.999). In the screening model, top 5 factors in terms of importance were EMAT, lymphocyte, LVST, CRP, and platelet. Conclusion: The ML model incorporating general data alongside ECG and PCG features carried out good detection performance for HF. This had the potential to be an available tool for clinicians to screen HF patients as early as possible for further clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.