ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Current trends in virtual electrophysiology use for risk stratification and treatment of ventricular arrhythmias.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Redefining Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: An Integrative Approach.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently efforts are being undertaken to establish and bring into clinical practice the field of virtual cardiac electrophysiology. The basic premise lies in acquiring an accurate whole-heart model based both on anatomy and electrophysiological properties of every myocardial voxel. Subsequently, one option is to perform a virtual electrophysiology study, with no constraints regarding site and number of extrasystoles in order to assess arrhythmogenic potential of the ventricle (ventricular arrhythmia risk prediction). The alternative, in cases with documented ventricular arrhythmia, would be to fine-tune the model into being able to simulate the clinical arrhythmia and then assess its mechanism, establishing vulnerable sites and thus ablation targets in order to guide the subsequent interventional procedure (virtual arrhythmia ablation targeting). Once clinical evidence supports vEP value in terms of accuracy and safety, it could be expected that even induced, nonclinical, arrhythmias could be targeted. Finally, advances in the field of computational power and artificial intelligence, including radiomics, along with stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation could render the future of arrhythmia management and treatment virtually unrecognizable in the not-so-distant future. The present mini review will attempt to familiarize clinicians with the tenets and current state of vEP, especially in the current phase where larger prospective clinical studies are required for further advancement, as well as offer a glimpse at potential future directions of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.