ArticleCureus2025
More Than a Headache: Unveiling Pituitary Apoplexy Following Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pituitary apoplexy (PA) is an endocrine emergency characterized by ischemia or hemorrhage of the pituitary gland. The main symptom is a sudden and severe headache, often accompanied by ocular palsies and visual field defects. Recognized risk factors include anticoagulation, hypertension, obesity, and major surgical procedures. A 72-year-old man with a history of partially resected pituitary macroadenoma was admitted for an acute coronary syndrome. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy were initiated, and he was awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). He experienced a sudden headache accompanied by palsies of the left third and sixth cranial nerves. An initial computed tomography (CT) scan revealed no remarkable findings; however, due to high clinical suspicion of PA, hydrocortisone treatment was initiated, and anticoagulation therapy was discontinued. No new hormonal deficits were observed. Subsequently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the diagnosis. Following a multidisciplinary consultation, a conservative management strategy was adopted. The patient's symptoms gradually subsided, and he successfully underwent CABG. This case highlights the limited sensitivity of CT scan, emphasizing MRI as the gold standard for diagnosis. The patient's acute coronary syndrome likely triggered the event, not only due to the antithrombotic therapy used but also through shared risk factors such as obesity. Although many patients require surgical intervention, certain cases may be managed effectively through conservative measures. This case demonstrates a successful outcome with a conservative approach, a strategy suitable for clinically stable patients who do not have severe or worsening visual deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.