ArticleCureus2025
Management Considerations for an Isolated Enlarged Cavum Septum Pellucidum: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the case of a male infant identified prenatally with an isolated enlarged cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) on ultrasound with otherwise normal neuroanatomy. At 24 weeks and four days of gestation, an anatomy scan demonstrated a CSP measuring 7.5 mm (95th percentile). A repeat maternal-fetal medicine ultrasound at 26 weeks and four days revealed further enlargement to 9.3 mm. While the CSP size was above average, no other structural anomalies were identified. The parents were counseled on potential associations, including chromosomal abnormalities and neurodevelopmental disorders. The pregnancy and delivery were otherwise uncomplicated. At 17 months of age, the child has met or exceeded gross motor, fine motor, language, and social-emotional developmental milestones. This case emphasizes the importance of distinguishing isolated CSP enlargement from cases with additional anomalies, providing appropriate counseling, and ensuring postnatal developmental follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.