ReviewCureus2025
Decoding Hyponatremia: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Pathways and Therapeutic Approaches Applied When Correction Fails.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder encountered in clinical practice. Conventional management strategies, including fluid restriction, hypertonic saline, and solute supplementation, often fail to achieve sustained correction, particularly in the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH), resulting in refractory cases. A systematic search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, guideline syntheses, and mechanistic research, with risk of bias carefully evaluated. Seven studies met inclusion criteria. Tolvaptan consistently improved serum sodium concentrations in patients with SIADH and heart failure, though its use was limited by high cost and the potential for overly rapid correction. Oral urea emerged as a safe, inexpensive, and reliable option for gradual, sustained normalization of sodium levels. Vasopressin receptor antagonists (vaptans) demonstrated superiority over fluid restriction in oncology-associated hyponatremia, although relapse was frequently observed following discontinuation. Demeclocycline exhibited mechanistic efficacy but remains limited by nephrotoxicity risk. Guideline-based analyses emphasized improved diagnostic precision but revealed inconsistencies in correction thresholds and recommendations for second-line therapy. When standard correction measures fail, clinicians should reassess the underlying etiology and escalate treatment accordingly. Vaptans offer rapid correction, urea ensures safe long-term management, and demeclocycline serves as a last-line therapeutic option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.