ArticleCureus2025
Radiologic Assessment of Malpositioned Indwelling Catheters and Medical Devices: A Retrospective Case Series With Pictorial Review.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndwelling medical devices such as central venous catheters (CVCs), ureteral stents, ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts, inferior vena cava (IVC) filters, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes, and nasogastric (NG) tubes are integral to modern clinical care. Malposition or migration, however, can result in severe complications, including vascular injury, organ perforation, infection, and obstruction. Radiologists are often the first to detect these complications, but interpretation may be challenging due to variable device types, insertion techniques, and patient anatomy.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective case-based review of malpositioned indwelling devices encountered in clinical practice at our institution. Each case was analyzed individually with attention to device type, insertion pathway, radiographic landmarks, abnormal positioning patterns, and associated complications. Representative examples were selected to create a pictorial review highlighting imaging pearls and diagnostic pitfalls.
resultsThe cases illustrate a wide spectrum of malposition patterns across commonly placed devices. Vascular access complications included arterial cannulation, aberrant venous placement, and migration into unexpected vascular channels. Ureteral stent malpositions demonstrated distal migration into the urethra and proximal perforation through the renal cortex. VP shunt cases showed distal extrusion into hollow viscera such as the rectum. IVC filter malpositions included tilt, strut perforation, and extension into adjacent organs. PEG tube malpositions resulted in intraperitoneal leakage and peritonitis, while NG tube misplacements involved tracheobronchial insertion and gastric perforation. These examples highlight both typical and rare presentations, underscoring the importance of systematic radiographic evaluation.
conclusionThis retrospective case series and pictorial review underscore the critical role of radiologists in recognizing malpositioned indwelling devices. Accurate interpretation requires a structured imaging approach, correlation with clinical context, and familiarity with device-specific pitfalls. By presenting illustrative examples across multiple device types, this work provides a practical reference to enhance radiologic vigilance, improve diagnostic accuracy, and ultimately prevent adverse outcomes in patients with indwelling catheters and medical devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.