ArticleCureus2025
Generative AI: A Disruptor to Health Professions Learner Assessment.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the widespread release of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools in recent years, there has been a dramatic impact on health professions education, particularly in the context of learner assessment. As GenAI continues to evolve, traditional paradigms in health professions education are changing, requiring students, administrators, and educators to navigate ongoing disruption to their practice. We examine how GenAI will specifically impact assessment practices, offering three key postulates to guide future teaching and learning: (1) educators must re-examine assessment constructs to align with GenAI-enhanced learning environments, (2) GenAI can outperform median learner performance with appropriate prompting, and (3) GenAI will become a required tool for health professions assessment. Ultimately, we believe that rather than viewing the advent of GenAI as a threat, educators should harness its potential to empower students and augment learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.