ArticleCureus2025
Improving Documentation of Intravenous Cannulation in a Resource-Limited Teaching Hospital: A Two-Cycle Quality Improvement Audit.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncomplete documentation of intravenous (IV) cannulation is a common problem that compromises patient safety, accountability, and continuity of care. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of introducing a standardized IV cannula documentation sticker on compliance with documentation standards in a resource-limited hospital.
methodsA two-cycle quality improvement (QI) audit was conducted at Al-Managil Teaching Hospital, Sudan, in 2025. In Cycle 1 (March 20-April 2), 50 inpatient records were retrospectively reviewed for compliance with IV cannula documentation standards. A one-month intervention was then implemented, introducing a standardized documentation sticker supported by staff training, posters, and ward-level reminders. Cycle 2 (June-September) reviewed another 50 records prospectively. Data were analyzed using frequencies, percentages, and chi-square tests, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsDocumentation compliance improved markedly across all parameters following the intervention. In Cycle 1, compliance ranged from 0 to 68%, while in Cycle 2, most parameters reached ≥ 95%. For example, documentation of insertion site improved from 4% to 100%, aseptic technique from 2% to 96%, and complications from 4% to 96%. Flushes/patency checks, while significantly improved (0% to 80%), remained lower than other domains. All improvements were statistically significant (p < 0.001).
conclusionsIn a resource-limited setting, a structured documentation sticker, combined with staff education, achieved near-universal compliance with IV cannula documentation standards. This low-cost, scalable intervention has the potential to strengthen patient safety, accountability, and quality of care. Sustaining progress will require re-auditing, ongoing staff reinforcement, and targeted focus on maintenance documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.