Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41356929›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Feasibility of Using Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression to Reduce Agitation in an Inpatient Psychiatric Unit.

Diane E Mathew, David P Mathews, Dongliang Wang, Derek W Empey, Elena C Nichita, Luba Leontieva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diane E MathewPsychiatry, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA.
David P MathewsPsychiatry, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA.
Dongliang WangPublic Health and Preventive Medicine, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA.
Derek W EmpeyPharmacy, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA.
Elena C NichitaPsychiatry, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA.
Luba LeontievaPsychiatry, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agitation in inpatient psychiatric units is common and is an important area for research given its impact on staff and patients. This study explores the feasibility and utility of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression (DASA) risk assessment instrument. The quality improvement project was implemented on two acute care inpatient psychiatric units in upstate New York (NY) over a two-and-a-half-month period. The study investigated the association of DASA scores with interventions. The interventions included emergent medication for agitation, seclusion, or restraint as measures of agitation. The study compared DASA scoring related to agitation levels in patients with the occurrence of administration of emergent medication, seclusion, or restraints for the same patients. This was done to investigate whether a higher DASA score correlated with more interventions. A two-sample t test was used to explore the link between DASA scores and interventions, including emergent medication, seclusion, and restraint. The study also investigated mental health nursing perspectives of the scoring tool through descriptive analysis. An anonymous survey was administered to nurses with five questions designed to assess how easy the scoring tool was to use and their perception of its utility. Analysis showed no association between the DASA score and interventions for agitation. The feasibility of the DASA tool was achieved, as survey results showed that nurses found DASA user-friendly. Potential reasons for these results could be associated with multiple factors, including the nature of agitation on these inpatient units and barriers to compliance with the tool.

Indexed as

agitationnursingprediction toolsquality improvement researchsafety

Identifiers

PMID41356929
PMCPMC12681344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.