ArticleCureus2025
An Unusual Case of Coarctation of the Aorta Repair: A 35-Year Follow-Up.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) is a congenital narrowing of the thoracic aorta, most often diagnosed in childhood. In adults, surgical repair is less common, with endovascular stenting now preferred when feasible. Open repair, however, remains essential in anatomically complex cases. We describe a male patient who presented in 1988 at age 34, with arterial hypertension and right arm hypoplasia. Imaging revealed severe post-ductal coarctation and an anomalous right subclavian artery arising immediately distal to the narrowed segment. During surgery, trial cross-clamping of the coarctation and aberrant artery resulted in a critical drop in distal pressure, precluding conventional resection and interposition grafting. A bypass repair with a 20 mm Dacron tube graft was performed. The postoperative course was uncomplicated. Thirty-five years later, computed tomography (CT) imaging confirmed the continued competence of the graft. This case illustrates the importance of tailoring CoA repair to individual anatomy. While interposition grafting remains the standard open technique in adults, bypass grafting provides a safe and durable alternative when cross-clamping is not tolerated or anomalous anatomy is present. Long-term follow-up demonstrates excellent durability of bypass grafting, reinforcing its continued role in the surgical armamentarium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.