ArticleCureus2025
Enhancing Sealant Retention: The Role of Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Preconditioning Under Saliva-Contaminated Conditions.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Laser-assisted enamel conditioning combined with acid etching has shown potential in enhancing micromechanical retention. However, most prior studies were conducted under ideal dry conditions, overlooking the impact of saliva contamination, a common clinical challenge during sealant placement. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effect of erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser pre-conditioning and saliva contamination on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a hydrophilic fissure sealant,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.