ArticlePNAS nexus2025
High content 3D imaging by dual-view oblique plane microscopy.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oblique plane microscopy (OPM) is a form of light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) employing a single microscope objective at the sample for both fluorescence excitation and detection. Dual-view OPM (dOPM) is an optically folded form of OPM. We present an improved dOPM system employing a 60×/1.2NA water immersion primary objective and measure the spatial resolution and fluorescence collection efficiency for illumination angles of 35° and 45° with respect to the coverslip. Illumination at 35° provides slightly better lateral resolution and collection efficiency. Collection efficiency measurements are compared to a full vectorial raytracing simulation of the system. Using a light-sheet angle of 35°, the median bead FWHM for 100 nm diameter fluorescent beads in x, y, and z and the optical sectioning strength were measured over a volume of 100 × 100 × 100 μm
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.