Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41356824›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025

Acute effects of exercise snacks on postprandial glucose and insulin metabolism in adults with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yuanbo Chang, Hai Wang, Xinbi Zhang, Haiyuan Liu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuanbo ChangCapital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Hai WangCapital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Xinbi ZhangCapital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Haiyuan LiuCapital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To quantify the acute effects of brief, frequent interruptions to prolonged sitting ("exercise snacks") on postprandial glucose and insulin in adults with obesity, and to explore potential effect modifiers. Data sources and methods: Following PRISMA 2020, seven sources (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP, CINAHL) were searched to July 10, 2025. Randomized crossover or parallel trials in adults with obesity comparing activity breaks with uninterrupted sitting were included. Co-primary outcomes were glucose and insulin incremental area under the curve (iAUC); secondary outcomes were total AUC (tAUC) and mean levels. Random-effects meta-analyses synthesized standardized or mean differences (95% CI); heterogeneity was quantified by I Results: Seventeen trials (261 unique participants; predominantly randomized crossover) were included. Versus uninterrupted sitting, activity breaks reduced glucose iAUC (SMD = -0.49, 95% CI -0.85 to -0.14; I Conclusion: In adults with obesity, interrupting sitting about every ≤30 min with 2-5 min of light-to-moderate walking or simple resistance acutely attenuates postprandial glucose and insulin responses. These findings support exercise "snacks" as a pragmatic behavioral strategy, while longer-term randomized trials are needed to define durability and refine dose parameters. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251144139, Identifier CRD420251144139.

Indexed as

exercise snacksglucose iAUCinsulininterrupting sittingobesitysedentary behavior

Identifiers

PMID41356824
PMCPMC12677009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.